Depend on the information that will given Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Depend on the information that will given - Essay Example A lot of different countries all over the world tried school uniform but later on were forced to abolish it due to the liberalization of the society. In the United States, the policy of mandatory school uniform started in the end of 1980s and it was aimed at decreasing gang formation and bullying (Han 1). Hence, according to Guerino et al., national reports indicate significant negative tendency in behavior of students that are prone to display violence and abuse (2). Currently, facing the question of imposing uniform on their children, many parents have rather polysemantic opinion about it despite the fact that they used to wear uniform themselves in early school years. Majority of parents do not prefer the idea of egalitarianism, some people do not like the design or comfort of the concrete uniform, and others on the contrary view the uniform as a solution to financial problem. Analyzing all advantages and disadvantages of uniform policy, it is fair to state that there are number o f reasons for approval of mandatory unified cloths in educational institutions. Firstly, uniform eliminates social conflicts because children are not encouraged to amaze each other with new trendy cloths and stand out of the crowd. There is no opportunity to judge classmates by their cloth and organize social groups according to the financial status of a child. Secondly, uniform creates conducive school environment and maintains discipline as it is supposed that looking formal helps students feel and behave more professionally. Thirdly, with the help of mandatory uniform policy, it is less complicated to ensure safety within a campus. When everyone is wearing the same attire, any intruder to the territory of a school can be easily identified. In addition to the decrease of social tension, egalitarianism diminishes economic barriers between learners, whose decision-making process regarding what they should wear in the morning is simplified considerably. Moreover, general uniform does not affect family budget in the same rate as diversified wardrobe of the child that is supposed to take place in case there is no mandatory uniform. It is quite obvious that one complete set of uniform costs much cheaper than several attires for a child to alternate with each other. Furthermore, no matter whether uniform is obligatory or not, school’s administration still must control outward appearance of the students and set limitations and basic rules of dress code for not letting children to cross the line of permissibility and decorum. However, in case all students are forced to wear unified cloths, the need to keep an eye on children’s look and provide further restrictions and punishments for not following the rules languishes. Also, a lot of experts consider that wearing uniform develops team building and strengthens school spirit. All these educe pride for educational institution and enhance fellowship between students, who get the same conditions, opportuniti es and treatment. Looking more as integrity than varicolored mass helps unite the collective and foster so-called corporate ethics. Analyzing aesthetics, it should be stressed that not all parents have a good taste therefore frequently children may look inelegantly and even preposterous meanwhile properly sewed uniform is able to liquidate some flaws in person’s appearance. Finally, the most important argument that convinces to stick to the uniform policy is

Evacuation Essay -- Papers

Evacuation The sources all show different attitudes tot the evacuation of children, some show that evacuation was a great success, however some show that it wasn't such a success. They all show this in different ways-pictures, interviews with the parents and teachers, advertisements and novels so some evidence is more reliable then others. Source A is a very positive attitude or impression to evacuation as it shows evacuees walking to the station in London in September 1939. The children don't look at all bothered, they seem to be smiling and waving to the person who is taking the photograph. Although this is a photograph so it will be real, it isn't that reliable in showing the attitudes or impression towards evacuation because the rest of Great Britain may have different views on the whole evacuation idea, probably a lot of children and the parent would be feeling quite distraught as it would be quite an emotional experience so it definitely isn't at all reliable at showing what evacuation was like and the publics attitude. It could be a source of propaganda; the government were probably trying to make out that evacuation was going well and that it would be a success. In a way this source does show that evacuation was a great success, yet it is a bit bias. Source B shows a negative attitude towards evacuation. Though it is an interview, it only gives one point of view. The interview is both reliable and unreliable as well, it is reliable because it is someone who has actually experienced the evacuation and this person had to look after the children who were being evacuated so this person will know what it was like... ...rces are very negative about evacuation, so I don't really think it was a great success for the public, as they were the ones who were experiencing it and they didn't really approve of it, however for the government it was a great success as they saved some of their population plus other countries thought it was successful too so this was good for the British government. None of the sources give a clear picture on what and how the public were feeling about evacuation and whether they thought it would be or was a success. Everyone in Britain all had very strong and different views about it. Although it does show that government had a very good attitude towards to their public and their safety. In my views, I don't think evacuation was a great success, it was successful but there could have been other ways of solving it. Evacuation Essay -- Papers Evacuation The sources all show different attitudes tot the evacuation of children, some show that evacuation was a great success, however some show that it wasn't such a success. They all show this in different ways-pictures, interviews with the parents and teachers, advertisements and novels so some evidence is more reliable then others. Source A is a very positive attitude or impression to evacuation as it shows evacuees walking to the station in London in September 1939. The children don't look at all bothered, they seem to be smiling and waving to the person who is taking the photograph. Although this is a photograph so it will be real, it isn't that reliable in showing the attitudes or impression towards evacuation because the rest of Great Britain may have different views on the whole evacuation idea, probably a lot of children and the parent would be feeling quite distraught as it would be quite an emotional experience so it definitely isn't at all reliable at showing what evacuation was like and the publics attitude. It could be a source of propaganda; the government were probably trying to make out that evacuation was going well and that it would be a success. In a way this source does show that evacuation was a great success, yet it is a bit bias. Source B shows a negative attitude towards evacuation. Though it is an interview, it only gives one point of view. The interview is both reliable and unreliable as well, it is reliable because it is someone who has actually experienced the evacuation and this person had to look after the children who were being evacuated so this person will know what it was like... ...rces are very negative about evacuation, so I don't really think it was a great success for the public, as they were the ones who were experiencing it and they didn't really approve of it, however for the government it was a great success as they saved some of their population plus other countries thought it was successful too so this was good for the British government. None of the sources give a clear picture on what and how the public were feeling about evacuation and whether they thought it would be or was a success. Everyone in Britain all had very strong and different views about it. Although it does show that government had a very good attitude towards to their public and their safety. In my views, I don't think evacuation was a great success, it was successful but there could have been other ways of solving it.

International Development Personal Statement

A degree In International studies will Improve my understanding of the impact of education, health, human rights, the environment, economics, conflict, and other fields on development as well as the Impact of under development on those fields. In Dalton, the multi-adolescently nature of the subject will enable me to explore options for later speculation. My Interest In International development has arisen out of my experiences as a child when I was fortunate to spend extended periods of time In Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam.In Thailand and Cambodia I became aware of the plight of refugees and displaced populations. In Vietnam I learnt about the effects of war on the population and the continuing effect of Agent Orange. I also became aware of the difficulties faced by ethnic minorities who don't speak the national language and don't have the same rights as the majority of citizens. From my experiences in South East Asia I can see that although we live in a globalizes world, the benef its of globalization are not spread equally between countries or within countries.Studying International Development will help me better understand why some countries have become developed, some are in the process of developing and some have not developed at all. I would like to understand the satirical forces like colonization, the impact of political systems like socialism and capitalism and the politics of aid such as why some countries receive help while others do not. In addition to understanding the causes of poverty and inequality, I want to understand how to change things for the better.I would like to learn about sustainable ways of lifting people out of poverty and ensuring their basic human rights. I would also like to understand how to ensure that social development doesn't harm the environment. A special interest that I have is to understand how best to assist people in emergencies like natural disasters and war and how to help them recover in the long term. The B progr ammer has enabled me to study a range of subjects from the fields of science and the humaneness rather than confining me to one specific field.I think that this Is excellent preparation for study of a multi- disciplinary course like International Development and topics such as politics, gender, economics, the environment and other global Issues. Although I have found the B programmer challenging, I have appreciated the opportunity It has provided to evolve critical thinking skills and Independent study skills as well as to broaden my outlook on the world in general.I feel the academic rigor of the B programmer has prepared me well for the challenges of undergraduate study. I am a keen sports seasons. I enjoy traveling and experiencing different cultures. I have enjoyed the greater independence given to students at The Henley College compared to the strict learning styles of conventional schools. I now feel ready to take on the challenge of university study and look forward to making the most of the opportunities that the study of a degree in international development will bring.

Should Brett Kavanaugh be put on the Supreme Court - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1836 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/08/16 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Supreme Court Essay Did you like this example? Brett Michael Kavanaugh is an American citizen, who was born on 12 February 1965, and has served in the judicial arm of government under different capacities. Kavanaugh holds two degrees, one in American History and another in Law. He acquired the two degrees from Yale University, a university considered one of the best in America. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Should Brett Kavanaugh be put on the Supreme Court" essay for you Create order Although he holds two degrees, he has practiced law for the better part of his life. Kavanaugh has managed to rise through the ranks in judicial service, and currently serves as an Associate Justice of the American Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Recently, Kavanaugh was nominated by President Donald Trump to the Supreme Court in place of the retiring justice, Anthony Kennedy while such nomination has sparked a mixed reaction in the United States due to a series of allegations surrounding his social life. While the name of Kavanaugh was still on the short list of Supreme Court nominees, a series of allegations were registered by different people to bar his nomination. One of the complainants was a professor of psychology from Alto University named Christine Blasey Ford. The professor claimed to have been sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh back in the year 1980 when they were still in high school (Stolberg, 2018). The allegation sparked mixed reaction considering that Kavanaugh was to serve in one of the highest Court in the land. The American constitution bars any form of abuse, and individuals with dirty records are not allowed to serve in offices of high capacity. Apart from Christine, other women also registered their claims about Kavanaughs sexual misconduct (Stolberg, 2018). Due to the high number of claims of sexual assault, the case was registered in the Senate judiciary committee, and FBI investigation launched to ascertain the claims. However, it is challenging to investigate in cidences that happened thirty years ago without any formal form of complaint registered. Cases of rape and sexual assault are based on immediate evidence, hence, compelling the complainants to produce substantial evidence that links the accused to the misconduct. In some instances, complaints may be a conspiracy launched by an opponent to malign the name of a nominee (McCarthy, 2017). As much as rape is considered a serious offense, care must also be taken in dealing with such cases. In the case of Kavanaugh, the complaints launched against him are based on historical assertions that are difficult to prove. The American constitution gives the President the power to appoint ambassadors, public ministers, and judges of the Supreme Court. The President in his capacity as the head of government can, therefore, appoint members to the positions mentioned above irrespective of their race, political, and religious affiliations (Gerhardt Stein, 2015). In the case of Supreme Court judges, the constitution gives the President the full privilege of appointing anybody without considering his or her qualification and citizenship. The reason for giving the President the privileges to appoint without qualification is because the Courts are considered to be the shield of evil and anybody can serve to defend the rights and interests of the people. Based on the reasons given above, the President is not to be held responsible for any form of misconduct associated with an appointee or nominee. President Donald Trump can, therefore, not be questioned on his choice of nominees. Therefore, nominating Kavanaug h to the Supreme Court was in line with the rights accorded to him by the American Constitution. When the President nominates a Supreme Court judge, the name is forwarded to the Senate for proper vetting before approval to the office. The Senates work is to conduct a background check and vet the nominee based on the registered misconducts, qualifications, and the ability to hold the position (Gerhardt Stein, 2015). In case the Senate declares the individual viable to hold the office, the approved name is then sent back to the President for confirmation. Besides, the Senate has the right to decline a nominee appointed by the President. The American constitution gives the Senate powers to dismiss the nomination of an individual based on academic qualification, misconduct and poor health (Gerhardt Stein, 2015). When the Senate rejects a nominees name, the entire process is repeated with the President appointing a new nominee. Hence, the goal is to find a perfect candidate. In most cases, presidential appointees pass the Senate vetting process due to the high numbers of senators in the presidential ruling party. Immediately after the Senates vetting, all senators are subjected to a vote that determines the fate of the nominee. Over the years, seventy percent of presidential nominees have passed the vetting process regardless of the allegations labeled against them (Christiansen Eskridge, 2014). These statistics are high because senators always vote along party lines without considering the consequences of approving a bad person. Approving such individuals is against the American constitution that stipulates that any person mentioned of any misconduct is and shall not be reasonable to serve in the office of the land under any capacity until the matter is settled. Even though the Senate has the powers to approve the nomination of a judge, the truth behind any launched allegation should be considered, and if the truth becomes difficult to prove, the nomin ee should be allowed to hold office. Although most of the presidential appointees pass the vetting, some cases registered before the Senate fail the validity tests, hence, leading to approval. Kavanaughs case still rests with the Senate considering that the Senate has the final say. When the Senate declines his nomination, Kavanaugh will have no option, but to retire from public service (Abramson Abrams, 2018). The constitution does not allow public servants with proven criminal records to hold government offices. When an allegation is proven right in the Senate, the nominee should lose both the current and target positions. Kavanaugh versus Christines case has attracted public attention considering that the allegations are based on an incident that took place more than 20 years ago. A significant percentage of the American population questions the timing of the allegation. Kavanaugh has served in the judicial service and risen to higher ranks with no serious allegations. It is still not clear why Christine, who is the major complainant of sexual assault, would prefer to wait for 36 years to launch a complaint (Chiacu, 2018). The complaint comes at a time when Kavanaugh is nominated for the highest judicial office in the land. Evidently, it has become a trend in the United States where sexual assault cases are reported only when certain individuals are at the verge of getting job promotions or business deals. Christine Blasleys complaint is based on a high school experience that no one witnessed. The American constitution is clear on the kinds of complaints that should be given priority. The allegations of sexual assault that bar individuals from office must be within their years of service in the government or the private sector. Throughout Kavanaughs profession as a lawyer and judge, there has never been any form of an allegation of sexual assault or gross misconduct (Becket, 2018). In every promotion step in the judicial service, background check and the level of competence are major considerations. Christine, who is a university professor, did not give clear details of her allegations towards Kavanaugh, and this makes it difficult to prove the authenticity of her claims. Kavanaugh should be allowed into the Supreme Court since the allegations labeled against him happened many years before he became a civil servant. Although sexual assault is immoral, a high school occurrence should not bar Kavanaugh from holding office. High school is full of youthful exuberance brought about by adolescence. In the case that a high school student is assaulted sexually, complaints were first registered with the head of school before taking any legal action. Apart from the school heads, students also explained their negative occurrences with parents who later reported the matters to the authorities. It was difficult for students to face officers of the law considering their fears of the police and lack of knowledge. The parents of Christine of could have reported the incident if the allegations are true. The American authorities have records of registered complaints, and if the allegation were never registered any time between the 1980s to date, the authenticity of the claim is in question (Stolberg, 2018). Records of the school authority can also be retrieved to prove the incident. In American law, the evidence is always a key factor that determines the outcome of a case or claim. Apart from America, almost all countries around the world are governed by laws. The evidence is the only tool that can make an individual to win a case. If the allegations against Kavanaugh are true, then the evidence must be strong enough to prove the allegation. The Senate approval depends on votes, and given the scandals that surround the nomination of Kavanaugh, some of the Republican supporters may opt to vote him out of the Supreme Court position (Abramson Abrams, 2018). Allegations of sexual assault in America are treated with much care considering gender equality rights. Americans believe that all genders are equal and at no time should one dominate the other. In case a female or male gender dominates the other, then the case is considered an assault. It is, therefore, the role of the Senate to decide whether Kavanaugh is hired for the position in the Supreme Court or his nomination is dismissed. Sexual assault cases are difficult to prove in law. Kavanaugh versus Christine is a unique case that can trigger some changes in the constitution of America. Fighting incidences of vague sexual assault claims require the American government to amend some laws within the constitution to address such cases. For instance, if the amendment is to be made, then cases of sexual assault should be reported within five years after, which the cases become invalid. When amendments of sexual assault are made, cases reported late in life will decrease by a significant percentage. In American history, allegations of sexual assault have crippled many careers and dreams. Christine is an American citizen who understands the laws of the land, and the magnitude of the claim that she registered. Hence, there is a possibility that she might have lied to stop the nomination of Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The case of Christine may be considered a conspiracy aimed at maligning Kavanaughs name. It beats logic for a case to be registered at a time when Kavanaugh is about to join the Supreme Court. There is no solid evidence linked to the assault, and this makes the claims suspicious. Early reporting of cases will help investigators to gather evidence before they diminish into the mist of time. Kavanaugh should be allowed to hold office considering the time factor. The time of the alleged incident cannot present fair ruling since all the evidence must have diminished if at all the allegations are true. Again, chances that the allegation is a conspiracy are also high, m aking the case difficult to decide. Therefore, the allegation should be nullified, and Kavanaugh allowed into the Supreme Court.